Freedom of Movement

Spitting contains no offensive remark; the police claim is ill-founded

hq720As we informed before, the RA Administrative Court completed examination of the RA Police claim against ‘Armenian Women’s Front’ member Susanna Simonyan on imposing on her administrative sanctions under Article 172.3 of the RA Code of Administrative Offences and Susanna Simonyan’s counter-claim on declaring the RA Police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Court’s ruling on Gayane Arustamyan’s case to be announced on March 14

gayane arustamyan1On February 23, 2017, the RA Administrative Court, presided by judge H. Ayvazyan, resumed examination of the RA Police claim on brining Gayane Arustamyan to administrative responsibility and Gayane Arustamyan’s counter-claim on declaring the RA Police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Further evidence on Gayane Arustamyan’s case to be submitted

gayane arustamyan1On September 24, 2016, the RA Administrative Court, presided by Judge H. Ayvazyan, carried out  trial examination of the administrative case under the RA Police claim against Gayane Arustamyan on bringing her to administrative liability and Gayane Arustamyan’s counter-claim against the RA Police to declare the RA Police actions unlawful. Note that the previous court hearing on this case was postponed due to the expired period of the power of attorney of the RA Police representative.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

New evidence to be submitted under Gayane Arustamyan’s case

gayane arustamyan1On June 21, 2016, the RA Administrative Court, presided by judge H. Ayvazyan, resumed the trial examination of the administrative case under a claim by the RA Police against Gayane Arustamyan to bring her to administrative liability and the counter-claim by Gayane Arustamyan against the RA Police to declare the RA Police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Court of Appeals found that the actions of the police officers against Gayane Arustamyan were lawful

gayane arustamyan1By its ruling of May 2, 2016, the RA Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed the appeal of Gayane Arustamyan’s representative Tatevik Siradeghyan, lawyer at Yerevan Office of HCA Vanadzor, against the

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Another motion on Gayane Arustamyan’s case submitted

gayane arustamyan1On May 6, 2016, the RA Administrative Court, presided by judge H. Ayvazyan, resumed the trial examination of the administrative case under a claim by the RA Police against Gayane Arustamyan to bring her to administrative liability and the counter-claim by Gayane Arustamyan against the RA Police to declare the RA Police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

RA Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed the appeal under Gayane Arustamyan’s case

gayane arustamyan1On May 2, 2016, the RA Court of Criminal Appeals, presided by T. Sahakyan, examined the appeal filed by aggrieved party Gayane Arustamyan’s representative, Tatevik Siradeghyan, lawyer at Yerevan Office of HCA Vanadzor, against the ruling of the General Jurisdiction Court of Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun administrative districts of Yerevan city of  March 17, 2016 on dismissing the appeal.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Court will consider the motion of Gayane Arustamyan’s representative

gayane arustamyan1On April 19, 2016, the RA Administrative Court, presided by judge H. Ayvazyan, resumed the trial proceedings on the administrative case under a claim by the RA Police against Gayane Arustamyan to bring her to administrative liability and the counter-claim by Gayane Arustamyan against the RA Police to declare the police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Citizen suffered illegal criminal prosecution

On November 27, 2015, A. M. from Gryumri consulted Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly Vanadzor reporting that he was apprehended by Gyumri police officers to Mush Division on April 20, 2015 where he was kept from 10 pm to 1 am. He was questioned and released. On the next day, he received a referral to forensic medical examination. The police officers explained that the investigation activities related to the murder committed in Gyumri on April 18, 2015.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Another pretrial court hearing on Gayane Arustamyan’s case scheduled

gayane arustamyan1On January 26, 2016, the RA Administrative Court, presided by judge H. Ayvazyan, held a next-in-turn pretrial court hearing of administrative case on a claim by the RA Police against Gayane Arustamyan to bring her to administrative liability and the counter-claim by Gayane Arustamyan against the RA Police to declare the police actions unlawful. Note that the previous court hearing of this case was adjourned, so that the defender’s representative could submit a counter-claim.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Trial of Taron Siradeghyan’s Case Completed

Dat5On December 4, 2015, the RA Administrative Court, presided by H. Ayvazyan, resumed the court examination of the administrative case on the claim by the RA Police against Taron Siradeghyan on administrative liability under Article 182 of the RA Code of Administrative Offences, and on the counter-claim by Taron Siradeghyan against the RA Police on considering the police actions unlawful. At the previous court hearing of the case, the court examination was completed and the Court passed to the stage of verbal pleadings and adjourned the hearing. The court hearing of December 4, 2015 was attended by Aida Demirkhanyan, legal representative of the plaintiff and counter-defendant RA Police, defendant and counter-plaintiff T. Siradeghyan and his legal representative Tatevik Siradeghyan. They delivered their final speeches.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Ruling of Administrative Court of Appeals on Khudoyans’ Case to be Appealed to RA Cassation Court

On November 25, 2015, the RA Administrative Court of Appeals presided by judge A. Abovyan, announced its ruling on the appeal of spouses Ashot Khudoyan and Heghine Makaryan removed by a group of police officers from the area near the RA Presidential Palace on December 2, 2013. Having examined the appeal against the RA Administrative Court judgment dated May 22, 2015, the Court ruled to dismiss it and upheld the judicial act of the lower court.

Continue reading

Leave a comment