Right to liberty and security

Spitting contains no offensive remark; the police claim is ill-founded

hq720As we informed before, the RA Administrative Court completed examination of the RA Police claim against ‘Armenian Women’s Front’ member Susanna Simonyan on imposing on her administrative sanctions under Article 172.3 of the RA Code of Administrative Offences and Susanna Simonyan’s counter-claim on declaring the RA Police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Court of Criminal Appeals noted: “Hovhannes Ghazaryan is unlikely to influence the police officers who testified against him”

12801271_1716764325232138_5242905604693408214_nAs we informed before, ‘Founding Parliament’ supporter Hovhannes Ghazaryan charged under Article 225 of the RA Criminal Code was released on February 13, 2017 by the ruling of the RA Court of Criminal Appeals.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Court’s ruling on Gayane Arustamyan’s case to be announced on March 14

gayane arustamyan1On February 23, 2017, the RA Administrative Court, presided by judge H. Ayvazyan, resumed examination of the RA Police claim on brining Gayane Arustamyan to administrative responsibility and Gayane Arustamyan’s counter-claim on declaring the RA Police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Investigator confirmed: “Disclosure by the doctor of the information that Kajik Grigoryan was a drug user was not required by professional necessity”

maxresdefault (2)On February 9, 2017, the General Jurisdiction Court of Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun administrative districts, presided by Judge A. Nikoghosyan, resumed examination of HCA Vanadzor NGO’s complaint under the case of Kajik Grigoryan, who burnt himself on Baghramyan Avenue.  

Note that in his interview to the journalists, N. Davidyan, Director of the Republican Scientific Center for Radiation Medicine and Burns, mentioned that the person who burnt himself was HIV-positive and “had drug addiction” and described him as an “avid drug addict” disclosing information on his 10 years’ imprisonment.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Further evidence on Gayane Arustamyan’s case to be submitted

gayane arustamyan1On September 24, 2016, the RA Administrative Court, presided by Judge H. Ayvazyan, carried out  trial examination of the administrative case under the RA Police claim against Gayane Arustamyan on bringing her to administrative liability and Gayane Arustamyan’s counter-claim against the RA Police to declare the RA Police actions unlawful. Note that the previous court hearing on this case was postponed due to the expired period of the power of attorney of the RA Police representative.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Complaint lodged to the European Court of Human Rights on the case of the Khudoyans forcibly removed from the area in front of the presidential palace

HCA Vanadzor lodged a complaint to the European Court of Human Rights on the case of Ashot Khudoyan and Heghine Makaryan, protesting spouses forcibly removed  by a group of plain-clothes police officers from the area in front of the RA Presidential Palace due to the official visit of the Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin to the Republic of Armenia on December 2, 2013.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Appeal on points of law submitted on the case of Karen Kyupelyan detained illegally for almost a day at the administrative premises of NSS

As reported before, on May 20, 2016, the RA Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal against the ruling of the General Jurisdiction Court of Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun administrative districts of Yerevan, RA, submitted by Tatevik Siradeghyan, lawyer at HCA Vanadzor Office in Yerevan and representative of Karen Kyupelyan detained illegally for almost a day at the administrative premises of NSS.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

New evidence to be submitted under Gayane Arustamyan’s case

gayane arustamyan1On June 21, 2016, the RA Administrative Court, presided by judge H. Ayvazyan, resumed the trial examination of the administrative case under a claim by the RA Police against Gayane Arustamyan to bring her to administrative liability and the counter-claim by Gayane Arustamyan against the RA Police to declare the RA Police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Court of Appeals dismissed Karen Kyupelyan’s appeal detained illegally for almost a day at the administrative premises of NSS

datOn May 20, 2016, the RA Court of Criminal Appeals, presided by judge K. Ghazaryan, resumed examination of the appeal submitted by Tatevik Siradeghyan, Karen Kyupelyan’s representative and lawyer at Yerevan Office of HCA Vanadzor, against the ruling of the General Jurisdiction Court of Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun administrative districts of Yerevan city, RA.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Examination of the appeal under Karen Kyupelyan’s case

datOn May 16, 2016, the RA Court of Criminal Appeals, presided by judge K. Ghazaryan, examined the appeal submitted by Tatevik Siradeghyan, representative of aggrieved party Karen Kyupelyan and lawyer at Yerevan Office of HCA Vanadzor, against the ruling of the General Jurisdiction Court of Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun administrative districts of Yerevan city, RA.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Court of Appeals found that the actions of the police officers against Gayane Arustamyan were lawful

gayane arustamyan1By its ruling of May 2, 2016, the RA Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed the appeal of Gayane Arustamyan’s representative Tatevik Siradeghyan, lawyer at Yerevan Office of HCA Vanadzor, against the

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Appeal filed under the case of Karen Kyupelyan detained illegally for almost a day at the administrative premises of NSS

datHelsinki Citizens’ Assembly Vanadzor has already reported that by its ruling of March 23, 2016, the General Jurisdiction Court of Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun administrative districts, Yerevan, RA dismissed the complaint submitted by Tatevik Siradeghyan, lawyer at Yerevan Office of HCA Vanadzor and representative of Karen Kyupelyan who had been detained illegally for almost a day at the administrative premises of NSS. By the complaint above, T. Siradeghyan required that the Court annulled the RA SIS Senior Investigator for High-Profile Cases A. Ohanyan’s decree of October 19, 2015 on not initiating criminal prosecution.

Continue reading

Leave a comment