Right to liberty and security

ECtHR received the complaints of ‘Sari Tagh’ district protesters

Mikayelyan-Ghazaryan-MIEDBy its letters of June 16 and July 12, 2017, the European Court of Human Rights stated that the ECtHR received the complaints of ‘Sari Tagh’ district protesters Gagik Mikayelyan and Hovhannes Ghazaryan.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Court of Appeals also rejected ‘Electric Yerevan’ participant’s complaint: a complaint will be filed with the Cassation Court (Video)

Elektrik_Yerevani_gorcOn July 20, 2017 the RA Court of Criminal Appeals resumed examination of the complaint of ‘Electric Yerevan’ participant Mikayel Kirakosyan and his representative Tatevik Siradeghyan, lawyer at Yerevan office of HCA Vanadzor, and ruled on the case.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Requirement to prosecute protestors is based on the explanations of police officers

download (7)In response to T. Siradeghyan’s question on the evidence proving that any order was issued to V. Petrosyan, S. Melikyan mentioned that there was no such evidence, except for the explanations of the police officers.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Persons responsible for the proceedings did not attend examination of ‘Electric Yerevan’ participant’s complaint

DAA9B0D7-5A9A-44F3-9504-FC2E75CC2906_cx0_cy7_cw0_mw1024_s_n_r1On May 11, 2017 the General Jurisdiction Court of Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun administrative districts rejected the complaint of ‘Electric Yerevan’ participant Mikayel Kirakosyan and his representative Tatevik Siradeghyan, lawyer at Yerevan office of HCA Vanadzor.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

After Cassation Court reversed the judicial act, the complaint under ‘Mataghis’ case is again in first instance court

դատToday, on June 9, 2017 the General Jurisdiction Court of Kentron and Nork-Marash administrative districts of Yerevan city started examination of the complaint filed on January 8, 2006 under ‘Mataghis’ case.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Police demands to prosecute protesters for obstructing the normal course of the assembly, but provides no relevant records

hasmik-evoyanOn June 6, 2017 the RA Administrative Court resumed examination of the claim by the Police against protester Hasmik Evoyan and the counter-claim on declaring the police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Protester V. Petrosyan’s representative demands to suspend the proceedings

download (7)On May 29, 2017 the RA Court of Appeals resumed examination of protester Vahram Petronsyan’s case.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Spitting contains no offensive remark; the police claim is ill-founded

hq720As we informed before, the RA Administrative Court completed examination of the RA Police claim against ‘Armenian Women’s Front’ member Susanna Simonyan on imposing on her administrative sanctions under Article 172.3 of the RA Code of Administrative Offences and Susanna Simonyan’s counter-claim on declaring the RA Police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Court of Criminal Appeals noted: “Hovhannes Ghazaryan is unlikely to influence the police officers who testified against him”

12801271_1716764325232138_5242905604693408214_nAs we informed before, ‘Founding Parliament’ supporter Hovhannes Ghazaryan charged under Article 225 of the RA Criminal Code was released on February 13, 2017 by the ruling of the RA Court of Criminal Appeals.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Court’s ruling on Gayane Arustamyan’s case to be announced on March 14

gayane arustamyan1On February 23, 2017, the RA Administrative Court, presided by judge H. Ayvazyan, resumed examination of the RA Police claim on brining Gayane Arustamyan to administrative responsibility and Gayane Arustamyan’s counter-claim on declaring the RA Police actions unlawful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Investigator confirmed: “Disclosure by the doctor of the information that Kajik Grigoryan was a drug user was not required by professional necessity”

maxresdefault (2)On February 9, 2017, the General Jurisdiction Court of Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun administrative districts, presided by Judge A. Nikoghosyan, resumed examination of HCA Vanadzor NGO’s complaint under the case of Kajik Grigoryan, who burnt himself on Baghramyan Avenue.  

Note that in his interview to the journalists, N. Davidyan, Director of the Republican Scientific Center for Radiation Medicine and Burns, mentioned that the person who burnt himself was HIV-positive and “had drug addiction” and described him as an “avid drug addict” disclosing information on his 10 years’ imprisonment.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Further evidence on Gayane Arustamyan’s case to be submitted

gayane arustamyan1On September 24, 2016, the RA Administrative Court, presided by Judge H. Ayvazyan, carried out  trial examination of the administrative case under the RA Police claim against Gayane Arustamyan on bringing her to administrative liability and Gayane Arustamyan’s counter-claim against the RA Police to declare the RA Police actions unlawful. Note that the previous court hearing on this case was postponed due to the expired period of the power of attorney of the RA Police representative.

Continue reading

Leave a comment